Parajecki v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
APPEARANCES:1
HURLEY, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court in the above-captioned case is a Motion by Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) for Reargument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3(j), of the motion by Xerox that was disposed of by the Court’s September 22, 1995 Order. See Parajecki v. International Business Machines Corp., 899 F.Supp. 1050 (E.D.N.Y.1995). For the reasons indicated below, Xerox’s Motion for Reargument is granted, and Xerox’s underlying Motion for Summary Judgment as to the claims by Plaintiffs Kathleen Parajecki and Allen Parajecki (collectively,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re New York Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Carino v. Town of Deerfield (Oneida County, NY)District Court, N.D. New York · 1990
- Parajecki v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Repetitive Stress Injury LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Naples v. Acer America Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
- Taylor v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997