Legal Opinion

Taylor v. International Business Machines Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 25, 1997No. Civil Action No. CCB-96-1119Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BLAKE, District Judge.

Now pending is the motion for summary judgment of the defendant, International Business Machines Corporation, (“IBM”), in this case involving claims of negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty. The plaintiffs allege that they suffered repetitive stress injuries (“RSIs”) from using IBM’s equipment while working as grocery store cashiers. IBM argues that the plaintiffs’ claims are time barred. This matter has been briefed fully, and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6.

In April 1993, the plaintiffs, Laurie Taylor, Shirley and James Grimes,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API