Legal Opinion
Parajecki v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1995No. 0:93-cv-03532PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court, in the above-captioned so-called repetitive stress injury (“RSI”) case, is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Canon U.S.A., Incorporated (“Canon”) 1 a Motion for Summary Judgment by Compaq Computer Corporation (“Compaq”), and a Motion to Dismiss by Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”). 2 The ground for each of these three motions is that the claims of Plaintiff Kathleen Parajeeki and her spouse, Plaintiff Allen Parajeeki, (collectively, “the Parajeeki Plaintiffs”) are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
For the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Piper v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Evans v. Visual Technology Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- In re Repetitive Stress Injury LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Harrison v. Olivetti Office USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Humphreys v. HumphreysDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.