Legal Opinion
In re Repetitive Stress Injury Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 26, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
As explained in the Court’s February 23, 1996 Order, counsel for plaintiffs in over forty (40) specified “repetitive stress injury” (“RSI”) cases has submitted a letter to the Court in reference to approximately sixty (60) pending motions by defendants that are based upon the applicable statutes of limitations.1 (See Lannigan’s Feb. 20, 1996 Letter.) * By such correspondence, the plaintiffs grouped defendants’ motions into two categories: (1) those that are directed at the pleadings and request no alternative relief, (see id. at 1-3); and (2) those that are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- The Grand Union Company v. Cord Meyer Development Corporation and King Kullen Grocery Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Thompson v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Parajecki v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Parajecki v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McDonough v. Cycling Sports Grp., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Kast v. Greater New Orleans Expressway CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. PachecoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- LS Cloud Storage Technologies, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- McReady v. Montgomery Community CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.