Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether an attorney against whom a grievance complaint has been filed with the statewide grievance committee (committee) must exhaust available administrative remedies before seeking judicial recourse from an adverse ruling of the committee.1 The plaintiff, Neil Johnson, an attorney, sought a permanent injunction in the Superior Court prohibiting the committee from taking any further action on a grievance complaint that had been filed against him. The committee moved to dismiss the plaintiffs action, claiming that the court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kennedy v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Debra A. Howell v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Stepney, LLC v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.