State v. Padilla
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
*674¶ 1 Jameel Padilla was convicted for communicating with a minor for immoral purposes. At issue here is Padilla's community custody condition prohibiting him from "possess[ing] or access[ing] pornographic materials, as directed by his supervising Community Corrections Officer" (CCO). Clerk's Papers (CP) at 37. Padilla argues that the condition and its accompanying definition of "pornographic materials" are unconstitutionally vague.
¶ 2 Although the condition includes a definition of "pornographic materials," the definition itself is vague and overbroad. A condition cannot be saved…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. WallmullerWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Anthony G. HouckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- State Of Washington, V. Alejandro Pena SalvadorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Christopher Sean BurrusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.