Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ellis
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1993No. CV-93-0107-PRPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.
FACTS
After Christopher Wilson (defendant) admitted that he had violated his probation, it was revoked, and he was sentenced to five years in prison. The court of appeals dismissed his appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4033(B)1 and Ariz.R.Crim.P. 27.8(e).2 State v. Wilson, 174 Ariz. 564, 851 P.2d 863 (App.1993). Defendant filed a petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) pursuant to Rule 32 and, alleging indigence, requested a transcript, at public expense, of the probation revocation proceedings, along with other items.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fleming v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. EthingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Marilyn Gene Summers v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Warden Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Montgomery v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WhippleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State v. BacaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.