Legal Opinion

State v. Whipple

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 23, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 92-1238-PRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOREMAN, Judge * .

Carl Whipple has asked this court to review the order of the superior court denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Ariz.R.Crim.P. 32.9. We deny review by summary order. This opinion explains our action in this case.

Publishing an opinion to explain an order is not without precedent. E.g., State v. Wilson, 174 Ariz. 564, 851 P.2d 863 (App.1993). It is consistent with the policies that govern publishing opinions found in Rule 111(b), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court.

Denying a petition for review of a petition for post-conviction relief by summary order is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Wilson v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Marilyn Gene Summers v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Warden Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Montgomery v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Montgomery v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API