Legal Opinion

State v. Baca

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 29, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0718PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

Stephen Sabin Baca (“defendant”) appeals from a trial court order denying his Rule 24.3 motion to modify sentence. See Ariz. R.Crim. P. 24.3. We dismiss defendant’s appeal because we find that in defendant’s circumstances, a direct appeal of a denial of a Rule 24.3 motion is precluded by Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-4033(B) (Supp.1995).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant entered into a probation violation agreement admitting that he violated a written term of his probation. 1 At the admission hearing conducted on July 13, 1995, the trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. BatemanArizona Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API