Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1996No. CR-95-0294-PRPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
This case is before us on the state’s petition for review from a court of appeals’ opinion affirming Defendant’s sentence for theft but remanding the case with instructions to have counsel review the record and file a supplemental petition for review in the court of appeals. State v. Smith, 183 Ariz. 424, 904 P.2d 1248 (App.1995). The state asks us to vacate the court of appeals’ holding that defendants who plead guilty are constitutionally entitled to counsel when pursuing in the court of appeals their discretionary petition for review from the trial court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Montgomery v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Cook v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. MataArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MilesArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Marilyn Gene Summers v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Warden Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.