Legal Opinion
Hamburger v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 28, 1952No. 34656PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,311.70 for damages from the destruction by plowing under of some 85 acres of matured unharvested wheat crop, the defendant appeals.
For reversal the defendant contends the evidence of plaintiff wholly fails to prove either the value of the wheat crop at the time and place of its alleged destruction, or facts from which its value can be computed, and that the trial court therefore erred in overruling his demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence and in denying his motion for a directed verdict.
The plaintiff’s evidence consisted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Crow v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Bowles v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- City of Okmulgee v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Shell Oil Co. v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Davison's Air Service, Inc. v. MontierthIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983