Legal Opinion
Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1983No. 82-1391PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Raymond Hager appeals from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of Clayton Peterson which found that Hager had negligently sprayed herbicide on Peterson’s pecan trees, causing $8,000 in damage.
Peterson owns 140 acres of pasture land near Ryan, Oklahoma. Within the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Odessa Woods v. The National Life and Accident Insurance Company, a Tennessee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Taylor v. GilmartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Hidalgo Properties, Inc. v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael Jones and Harold Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Shinn Fu of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989