Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Haworth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1938No. 27400PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action for damages for the obstruction of what plaintiff contends is a natural water course causing flood water to back up on to his premises. Plaintiff, Mack Haworth, owned a tract of land in the Arkansas river bottom, and leased another tract owned by E. E Pratt, adjoining plaintiff’s land on the northeast, which he operated as a farm. The defendant, Sid Garrett, owned a tract of land directly east of the leased premises, separated by a county road running north and south. It was alleged that from time immemorial a natural water course, which drained the surrounding area,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. All American Bus Lines v. SaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Jay Clutter Custom Digging v. EnglishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. In re Oklahoma Planning & Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API