Legal Opinion

Crow v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1939No. 28993PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, C. J.

Frank Crow and Mrs. Frank Crow appeal from a judgment in favor of J. F. Davidson.

Davidson, as plaintiff, brought the action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered when defendants evicted him from the land leased by them to him, and thereafter excluded him by force. His elements of damages were (1) the loss of the two-year lease; and (2) the loss of certain growing crops that defendants destroyed, and the loss of certain items of personal property alleged to have been converted by the defendants. His theory was that because his eviction and exclusion were forcible, and that under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Sanders v. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Wagoner v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Oden v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Burke v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API