Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1981No. 80-1404PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue before this court is whether appellant utilized the proper remedy to obtain back pay, benefits, and reinstatement allegedly due him from the layoff *65of October 21, 1977. Mandamus is the proper remedy under these facts. State, ex rel Hamlin, v. Collins (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 63; State, ex rel. Colangelo, v. McFaul (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 200; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 261; State, ex rel. Osborn, v. Jackson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41; State, ex rel. Dean, v. Huddle (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 234; Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 190.

The layoff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Dean v. HuddleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Colangelo v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Butterbaugh v. Ross County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Millington v. Morrow County Bd. of Commiss., 2008ca0011 (5-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API