Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 2005No. 01C10035; A121726PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In our former opinion in this case, we held that the post-conviction court erred by granting petitioner post-conviction relief without vacating her convictions. Hinton v. Hill, 197 Or App 238, 105 P3d 923 (2005). We concluded that, under ORS 138.530(l)(a), post-conviction relief was available to petitioner only if her convictions were void and, therefore, relief could not be granted without vacating the convictions. The state has petitioned for reconsideration, arguing that our conclusion is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Shipman v. Gladden, 253 Or 192, 453 P2d 921 (1969).…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hinton v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Meyers v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hinton v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API