Lacy v. Carrier Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PADOVA, District Judge.
In this product liability suit, Plaintiff Harold Lacy seeks to hold Defendant Carrier Corp. (hereinafter “Carrier”) liable under a theory of “successor liability” for injuries he sustained when he came into contact with an exhaust fan manufactured by a firm that was later acquired by Carrier. Plaintiff asserts causes of action in negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty. Presently before the Court is Carrier’s motion for summary judgment. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment; Plaintiff moves the Court to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gower v. Savage Arms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Dale v. Webb Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003