Parkin v. Grayson-Owen Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. Wm. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The cause of action is for damages arising out of the alleged violation of the following ordinance of the city of Oakland: “No person shall leave or allow any horse or mule to he or remain standing upon any of the public streets of the city of Oakland unless such animal is in some way properly secured either by hitching or being under the personal control of some person of suitable" age.” This .is the second appeal taken- by the defendant in the .case and is from the judgment and order denying motion for a new trial in an action for personal injuries. The decision on the first appeal is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Spear v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Parkin v. Grayson-Owen Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- State Ex Rel. First National Bank of Wisconsin Rapids v. M & I Peoples Bank of ColomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Katz v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Katz v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.