Legal Opinion

American Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1962No. Civ. 19610PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This is another of the plethora of cases coming to the courts in which insurance carriers engage in an internecine struggle to determine which carrier should discharge a loss under primary and “excess” coverage provisions. In entering the legalistic labyrinth of the provisions of the policies, we are not favored, like Theseus, with any thread of principle; each case apparently presents a particularistic and unique problem. The obscurities of overlapping coverage have, indeed, led some experts to urge legislative clarification. 1 In the absence of such statutory definition, our efforts in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Northern Assurance Co. of America v. EDP Floors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Entz v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. INT'L BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. v. Truck Ins. Exch.California Supreme Court · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API