Legal Opinion
Gantry Construction Co. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 1975No. Civ. 42805PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
In September 1966, appellant, American Pipe and Construction Co. (Ameron) 1 contracted to sell a substantial quantity of pipe 2 to respondent, Gantry Construction Company (Gantry), for use in constructing a project for the City of Los Angeles. The contract called for delivery of the pipe in installments, for invoicing the delivered pipe, and for payment by Gantry for delivered pipe by the 25th of each month after invoice. Pursuant to the provisions of its contract with the city, Gantiy procured a performance bond from Pacific Indemnity (Pacific).
It is clear from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Williams v. the Daily Review, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- McCracken v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Turnbull v. Herald CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.