Legal Opinion

Teich v. General Mills, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1959No. Civ. 23513PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

This case falls within the ambit of Desny v. Wilder, 46 Cal.2d 715 [299 P.2d 257]. Plaintiff sued to recover upon a contract to pay the reasonable value of an idea submitted to defendant in concrete form, a gadget for use as a premium in one of its products, a “new children’s do-it-yourself item in the photographic field.” Plaintiff did not claim novelty and originality which would make his “premium item” protectible property within the common law of copyright and plagiarism. He relied upon contract.

A jury awarded plaintiff a recovery in the sum of $35,000. Motion for directed verdict had…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Vantage Point, Inc. v. Parker Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  3. Krause v. ApodacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Donahue v. Ziv Television Programs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API