Legal Opinion
Westfall v. Cross
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 2001No. Case No. 00-BA-5PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Waite, Judge.
This timely appeal arises out of the denial of pro hac vice status to attorney Kenneth Barton in a January 14, 2000 judgment entry issued by the Belmont County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant maintains that the ruling of the trial court was final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and that the court abused its discretion. We hold that an unqualified denial of pro hac vice status is a final and appealable order but that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the instant case. The trial court decision is hereby affirmed.
The underlying litigation from which this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reo v. Univ. Hosp. Health Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Douglass v. PriddyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Chambliss, 91272 (10-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Shen v. LamOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bank of New York v. AponteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.