Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Enyart v. O'Neill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1995No. 94-594PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to obtain a writ of prohibition, appellants had the burden of proving that Judge O’Neill was about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial authority, that exercise of this power was unauthorized by law, and that they had no other adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Keenan v. Calabrese (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 176, 178, 631 N.E.2d 119, 121. At the time appellants filed their prohibition action in the court of appeals, Judge O’Neill was about to exercise judicial authority to consider the merits of CMACAO’s appeal of the arbitration decision. However, the court of appeals denied the writ…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Sanquily v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Gyurcsik v. AngelottaOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Kreps v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API