Legal Opinion

Sabo v. Horvath

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1976No. 2682PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises because Grover C. Lowery conveyed the same five-acre piece of land twice — first to William A. Horvath and Barbara J. Horvath and later to William Sabo and Barbara Sabo. Both conveyances were by separate documents entitled “Quitclaim Deeds.” Lowery’s interest in the land originates in a patent from the United States Government under 43 U.S.C. § 687a (1970) (“Alaska Homesite Law”). Lowery’s conveyance to the Horvaths was prior to the issuance of patent, and his subsequent conveyance to the Sabos was after the issuance of patent. The Horvaths…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. McDonald v. LambertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lamb v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Hawley v. McCabeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Russian-American Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Messerli v. Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Spring Lakes, Ltd. v. O.F.M. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API