Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Carkins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1890No. 322PublishedCited by 87 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer

On December 16, 1876, the parties hereto entered into the following contract;

“This agreement-made and entered into on this 16th day of December, by and between Joseph Anderson and Hannah Anderson, his wife, of the county of Adams and the State of Nebraska parties of the first part, and Levi Carkins of Adams County, Nebraska, party of the second part, witnesseth:
“That the said parties of the first part have this day sold, for and -in' consideration of the sum of one hundred dollars,' to them' in hand paid' by the said Levi Carkins, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the following real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oaks v. HeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Dawson v. MerrilleNebraska Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Nutt v. KnutSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Ferris v. FrohmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API