State v. LeBrun
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of morphine sulphate, a narcotic drug, and has appealed.
His defense was entrapment and the sole assignment of error is directed to the court’s refusal to give the following requested instruction:
“The defendant in this case has claimed entrapment as a defense. "Where the doing of a particular act is a crime, if the intent to do the act originates with the defendant, the fact that an opportunity is furnished in order to secure the evidence necessary to prosecute him does not constitute a defense.
“However, if the criminal intent to do the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. ReisenweberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ReichenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- State v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.