Legal Opinion

State v. LeBrun

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of morphine sulphate, a narcotic drug, and has appealed.

His defense was entrapment and the sole assignment of error is directed to the court’s refusal to give the following requested instruction:

“The defendant in this case has claimed entrapment as a defense. "Where the doing of a particular act is a crime, if the intent to do the act originates with the defendant, the fact that an opportunity is furnished in order to secure the evidence necessary to prosecute him does not constitute a defense.

“However, if the criminal intent to do the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. United States v. ReisenweberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ReichenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. State v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API