Legal Opinion
United States v. Reisenweber
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 18, 1923No. 138PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The United States filed the bill of complaint in this suit pursuant to authority granted in section 22, title II, of the Act of Congress of October 28, 19Í9, known as the “National Prohibition Act” (41 Stat. c. 85, pp. 305, 314). The suit was brought for the purpose of enjoining and abating what the bill alleged to be “a certain public and common nuisance” as defined in section-21, title II, of the act of Congress above referred to. The section may be found in the margin.1
The complaint alleged that the premises at Nos. 981, 983, and 985-Eighth avenue, in the borough of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- In Re ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Newman v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- Calvin Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.