Legal Opinion

State v. Neely

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1965PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of statutory rape upon a stepdaughter. ORS 163.220. He appeals upon the ground that he was deprived of constitutional rights guaranteed to him by the “due process” clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. He alleges that his oral and written confessions were inadmissible because they were obtained prior to his having been taken before a magistrate, and before he had been afforded the assistance of counsel.

Sometime between 3:30 and 4:00, p.m., two deputy sheriffs arrested the defendant at his place of employment. The arrest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. The People v. HartgravesIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. NegriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1979

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API