State v. Reichenberger

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

Defendants appeal from felony convictions for possession and sale of marijuana in violation of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act (K. S. A. 65-2501, et seq.). In a trial to the court the defense of entrapment was asserted by each defendant. The trial court’s adverse finding is the subject of attack in this appeal. Defendants contend the evidence established entrapment as a matter of law.

The information was filed in two counts. Defendant Fouch was charged individually in count one and jointly with Defendant Reichenberger in count two. The…