Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 1973No. C 72-10-3424 CrPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of criminal activity in drugs. ORS 167.207. He appeals, asserting that the trial court erred both in denying a pretrial motion to suppress certain identification testimony, and in refusing to give a requested jury instruction on the defense of entrapment. •

We affirm the trial court.

The relevant facts are as follows: Late on the afternoon of October 6, 1972, Special Agent Horn, of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, received a- call from an informer. Agent Horn was then operating as an undercover agent investigating narcotics traffic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. KorelisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API