Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Dickerson

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided December 7, 1995No. Civil Action 94-D-1593-NPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is the defendants Joseph Dickerson, Richard Moncus, Bud Chambers, Billy M. Turner, Joe L. Reed, Mark Gilmore, Jr., Leu W. Hammonds, Alice D. Reynolds, Rick McBride, and City of Montgomery, Alabama’s motion filed January 31, 1995, to dismiss the above-styled case. The plaintiff responded in opposition on October 26, 1995.

For the reasons asserted herein, the court finds that the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim arising under the Fifth Amendment is due to be granted. The court also finds that…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. ShottsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Hardy v. Town of HaynevilleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  3. Kuhn v. ThompsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  4. Denno Ex Rel. Denno v. School Board of Volusia CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
  5. Arrington v. DickersonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API