Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Dickerson
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided January 31, 1996No. Civil Action 94-D-1593-NPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE ME NT, District Judge.
In Arrington v. Dickerson, 915 F.Supp. 1503 (M.D.Ala.1995) (De Ment, J.), 1 the court granted without prejudice the Montgomery City Council defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amendment retaliation claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and simultaneously granted the plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to plead this claim with specificity. On December 15, 1995, the plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint, which is now before the court. For the reasons stated herein, the court finds that said motion is due to be denied.
Upon…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- LaFleur v. Wallace State Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- 2025 Emery Highway, LLC v. Bibb County, GeorgiaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005