Legal Opinion

Appert v. Appert

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 857DC1115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We must first determine whether plaintiffs appeal is premature. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-277 (1983) and 7A-27 (1981), taken together, provide that no appeal lies to an appellate court from an interlocutory order or ruling of the trial judge unless the ruling or order affects a substantial right claimed in the proceeding. See Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 270 S.E. 2d 431 (1980); Waters v. Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E. 2d 338 (1978). It is not disputed that the order in question is interlocutory; therefore, we need only determine whether it affects a substantial right so…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. In Re Custody of StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Westgate v. WestgateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Turnmire v. AndCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API