Legal Opinion

Cook v. Botelho

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1996No. S-7253, S-7263PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We are here required to construe the constitutional allocation of the power to appoint and remove members of regulatory commissions, and the constitutional and statutory provisions governing appointments during a recess of the legislature. The superior court entered summary judgment in favor of Attorney General Bruce Botelho, holding that Tim 0. Cook does not lawfully hold the office of Alaska Public Utilities Commissioner. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In October 1994 Governor Walter Hickel named Cook to a vacant position on the Alaska Public…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Arco Alaska, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bradner v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Barrett v. DuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Alaska Legislative Council v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Nickels v. NapolilliAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  5. Hall v. Prince George's County Democratic Central CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API