Legal Opinion
Randle v. California State Board of Pharmacy
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1966No. Civ. 22471PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Appelant husband and wife, brought this mandate proceeding to set aside the decision of respondent board revoking appellant Lloyd R. Randle’s certificate to practice pharmacy and appellant Cecil Randle’s permit to maintain and conduct a pharmacy.
The two are jointly charged in the first four of the five counts alleged in the accusation filed with the board. The fifth count is against the husband alone. The wife’s responsibility for the claimed misconduct is vicarious, being based upon respondent superior. She employed her husband to manage and operate the pharmacy. The other employees were one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mast v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Cooper v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Caro v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Morell v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Anthony v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Shakin v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. BevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Elder v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.