Legal Opinion

Anthony v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1960No. Civ. 9815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNS, J. pro tem. *

An accusation was filed with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, charging Anthony Presto and James Presto, doing business as the 49 Club (situated at 824 9th Street, Modesto, California), the possessors of a general on-sale liquor license, with having violated sections 25601 and 25657, subdivision (b), as those sections relate to section 24200, all of the Business and Professions Code, and article XX, section 22, of the California Constitution. The accusation is in four counts. Count I charged a violation of section 25601, in that appellants permitted their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Greenblatt v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Endo v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Nelson v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Karides v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Miller v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Randle v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API