Legal Opinion
In Re Smith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2002No. 01-BG-1108PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent Michael J. Smith was publicly censured by the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, for failing to cooperate with the New York Grievance Committee. Specifically, he failed to respond to numerous notices and requests for a response regarding his failure to register with the New York Office of Court Administration. Respondent contacted the Grievance Committee only once during the year-long proceedings, but did ultimately pay his registration arrears. Respondent’s conduct violated the New York rules prohibiting conduct that is prejudicial to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re PearsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re McGowanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re DunietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re SheinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re SpitzerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.