Legal Opinion

Ziller Electronics Lab GmbH v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1988No. B034528PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (A. M.), P. J.

In this original proceeding in mandate a foreign defendant challenges a trial court’s denial of its motion to quash a second service of process for lack of minimum contacts. The motion was denied on the ground that the issue has been determined adversely to defendant on its prior successful motion to quash the first service.

The critical question presented is the effect, if any, of a determination that minimum contacts exist when the motion to quash is nevertheless granted for lack of effective service of process. Must the prior determination of minimum contacts be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. BettsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Kerns v. CSE Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API