Legal Opinion
People v. Betts
California Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 2005No. S111309PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
Defendant John Paul Betts was convicted in the Riverside County Superior Court on a number of counts involving lewd acts committed on a child. Some of these acts were committed in California but outside of Riverside County, and some were committed outside of the state. His convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeal. We granted review to consider the following issues: (1) When a criminal prosecution is brought in California, and the alleged criminal activity occurred in part outside California, is the determination whether a California court has jurisdiction over the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Carvajal v. ArtusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SerratoSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State v. DenofaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.