Legal Opinion

Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 10, 2001No. Nos. 00-306C, 00-367CPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

FUTEY, Judge.

These bid protest cases are before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record.2 Plaintiffs Northrop Grumman Corporation (Northrop) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed) ask the court for a permanent injunction to halt performance on and to re-solicit a contract for the production and installation of airport radar systems entered into by Raytheon Company and the United States government (defendant), acting through its agents the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Plaintiffs allege that two…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. A & D Fire Protection, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API