Legal Opinion
Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 22, 2004No. 04-94CPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT UPON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 The plaintiff, Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc. (“Cardinal”), challenges the award of a contract for custodial services at Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii (“Hickam AFB”) to the intervenor, Navales Enterprises, Inc. (“Navales”). Prior to the award of the contract in dispute, Cardinal had been the incumbent custodial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Parcel 49c Limited Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Hunt Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- A & D Fire Protection, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Afghan American Army Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Information Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bayfirst Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.