Legal Opinion

Carson v. Vance

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1913No. 2414PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Court; . Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by Asa J. Vance against Mary C. Carson. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TURNER, J..This action was commenced by Asa J. Vance, defendant in error, against Mary C. Carson, plaintiff in error, before a justice of the peace in Oklahoma City, to recover a commission on a sale of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed to the county court, and from a judgment against her there,, to this court. The bill of particulars upon which the case was tried in the county court states:

“* * * That the plaintiff was an agent and broker engaged in the selling of real estate upon commission. That on or about the 19th day of March the defendant listed with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Birch v. McNaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Dolezal v. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Reynolds v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of United States v. HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Deming Inv. Co. v. BrittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API