Legal Opinion

Deming Inv. Co. v. Britton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1919No. 8971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, C. J.

The Deming Investment Company sued W. L. Britton to. recover an agreed compensation for its services in negotiating a loan for him. The petition alleged employment of plaintiff as agent for said purpose, its acceptance of employment, the/ obtaining of the loan for defendant by plaintiff, and a breach by defendant in fail-, ing to execute papers and refusing to perform Ms part of the agreement. The amount of the loan to be procured was $8,-500, and-the commission which plaintiff was to receive was $1,190. There was a clause, in .the contract which provided that if defendant should refuse to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. C. E. Sharp Lumber Co. v. Kansas Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Wm. Cameron & Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Vandever v. GoetteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Kimberly v. DeWittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Epperson v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API