Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Markham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1910No. 498PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by J. A. Markham and others against D. Roberts. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Citing: Tyler v. Parr, 52 Mo. 249; 1 Ballard, Real Prop., §361.

1Opinion of the Court

■WILLIAMS, J.

The commission for the sale of a certain lot in the city of Muskogee is involved in this action. The case having been tried by the court without-the intervention of a jury, and a general finding having been made in favor of the plaintiffs, the same is a finding of every special thing necessary to be found in order to sustain the general finding, and is conclusive upon this court upon all doubtful and disputed questions of fact. McCann v. McCann et al., 24 Okla. 264, 103 Pac. 694.

The exclusive right to sell not being given, the owner may sell independent of the agent, and in such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tyler v. ParrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Graves v. Bains & WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lincoln v. McClatchieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  5. Jones v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Treese v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Loman v. PaullinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Eichoff v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API