Legal Opinion
Senter v. BF Goodrich Company
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 18, 1954No. Civ. 3580, 3702PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
These two cases were consolidated for trial inasmuch as both actions arise out of injuries received by the plaintiffs in an automobile accident which occurred as the direct result of a blow-out of a tubeless tire, manufactured and sold by the defendant company. Mr. Senter, plaintiff in Case No. 3580, was the owner and passenger of the car involved in the accident and Mr. Stenman, plaintiff in Case No. 3702, was the driver of the car at the time of the blow-out.
Both complaints allege two separate causes of action or theories for recovery. The first numbered cause of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Tallent v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Fleming v. DillonIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
- Dillon v. William S. Scull Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Ford Motor Company v. J. W. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sylvester Hansen v. Firestone Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Warwick Dev. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.