Pitt-Hart v. Sanford USD Medical Center
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice
[¶ 1.] Barry Thomas Pith-Hart appeals the circuit court’s order granting 1 summary judgment to defendant Sanford USD Medical Center. Pitt-Hart argues that he commenced his action within the- three-year statute of- limitations applicable to general-negligence actions and that the court erred by determining his action was time barred. He also argues that even if a shorter' statute of limitations applies, it should have been tolled. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History'
[¶ 2.] On November . 1Ó, 2009, Pitt-Hart underwent a knee-replacement surgery at Sanford. The day after surgery, while…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lozano v. Montoya AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- CTS Corp. v. WaldburgerSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Cunningham v. HuffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Healy Ranch v. HealySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Estate of FrenchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.