Legal Opinion
America Hernandez v. Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension Trust
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1981No. 79-3616PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, District Judge:
This is an appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension Trust (the “Trust”) after both parties had made cross-motions for summary judgment. The facts are not in dispute.
Appellant filed suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) (all subsequent statutory references are to ERISA, as codified in 29 U.S.C.), seeking a declaration that she is entitled to receive her husband, Mario Hernandez’, pension benefits under the Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ellis M. Hurn v. Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry of SoutherncaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Program Engineering, Inc. v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Carpenters Pension Trust for Southern California v. Brenda Ann KronschnabelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Richard P. Kuntz v. Nat J. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hlinka v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Barrowclough v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.