Legal Opinion
Hlinka v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 8, 1988No. 88-1347PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Chief Judge.
I
Joseph W. Hlinka appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Bethlehem Steel Corporation (BSC), the Bethlehem Pension Board, and the Bethlehem Plan Administrator in Hlinka’s suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1982). When reviewing grants of summary judgment, our scope of review is plenary. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038, 97 S.Ct. 732, 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977). We will affirm.
II
Hlinka was hired by BSC on April 2, 1962. He is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Maria C. Maldonado v. Orlando RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Sidney P. Small and William Landesman, D/B/A Small & Landesman v. Seldows Stationery, Jack Belowitz, Irving Platt and Irwin KatzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Anthuis v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.