Legal Opinion
Richard P. Kuntz v. Nat J. Reese
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1986No. 83-2151PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Per curiam
Shortly after we decided this case on May 13, 1985, see Kuntz v. Reese, 760 F.2d 926 (9th Cir.1985), the Reese defendants1 petitioned our court to rehear this matter. The Reese defendants argue, among other things, that several persuasive authorities outside this circuit undermine the conten*1411tion that the Kuntz plaintiffs2 had standing under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1381 (1982), to sue for breach of fiduciary duty and nondisclosure of pension plan documents.
After carefully considering these authorities, we have now concluded that the Kuntz…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- John H. Freeman, M.D., Cross-Appellee v. Jacques Orthopaedic and Joint Implant Surgery Medical Group, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Melbourne E. Joseph, Sr. v. The New Orleans Electrical Pension & Retirement Plan, Individually and Its TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Richard P. Kuntz v. Nat J. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vartanian v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.