Auto Alarm Supply Corp. v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
Plaintiff, Auto Alarm Supply Corporation, (Auto Alarm) appeals after judgment on a directed verdict for defendant, Lou Fusz Motor Company, (Lou Fusz) in an action for conversion. Auto Alarm claimed a lien on an automobile under common law and statutory artisan’s liens. We hold there is evidence to support submission on the issue of conversion against Lou Fusz, a conditional vendor. The terms of the conditional sales contract placed the conditional vendee in the position of owner of the automobile in relation to Auto Alarm. Thus, the conditional vendee’s failure to pay Auto Alarm…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Head v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Auto Alarm Supply Corp. v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Friese v. MallonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Minton v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- United States Central Underwriters Agency, Inc. v. Manchester Life & Casualty Management Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dean MacHinery Co. v. Union BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mertz v. Blockbuster, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Tri-County Levee District v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Fabius River Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- George Aldridge v. Charla Francis and Jason CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.